Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-19

GAGANDEEP ALIAS GAGAN BANSAL ALIAS KALI vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 9102/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
GAGANDEEP ALIAS GAGAN BANSAL ALIAS KALI
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M No.9102 of 2026 -1- 209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.9102 of 2026 Date of Decision: 19.05.2026 Gagandeep @ Gagan Bansal @ Kali ….. Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ….. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ ***** Present: Mr. P. S. Jammu, Advocate; Mr. R. P. S. Jammu, Advocate; Mr. R. K. Poonia, Advocate and Mr. Akashdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raj Karan Singh, Asstt. A.G., Punjab. ***** RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. 1. Present second petition has been filed praying for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.108, dated 12.05.2025, under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(3), 191(3), 190, 117(2), 110 of BNS, registered at Police Station Lambi, District Sri Muktsar Sahib. 2. Succinctly, the facts of the case are that FIR in the present case was got registered on the statement of complainant, namely, Sahil Soni. It was alleged that the complainant was running an Ahata with his father in Dana Mandi, Killianwali from about 04 months. It was alleged that Amit Arora @ Shanka often comes to the Ahata and the complainant was to take Rs.4000/- from him and whenever he demanded money form RITTU 2026.05.20 10: