Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-07

FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. 233 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. 233 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. 233 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 233 of 2026 Dinesh Kumar .....Appellant(s) Versus Smt Roshani And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Jigyasha Tripathi, Surendra Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashok Kumar Srivastava Court No. - 39 HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J. (Order on Delay Condonation Application) 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. Sri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent no.5/Insurance Company is present. 3. Notice have been issued to respondent nos. 1 to 4 and 6 by way of registered post. 4. Office reports that neither undelivered cover nor any acknowledgment has been received and no one put appearance. 5. In view of judgment of the Supreme Court in C.C. Alavi Haji Vs. Palapetty Muhammed and another; AIR 2007 SCC (Suppl) 1705 as well as this Court in Hari Gopal Vs. Vijay Kumar; 2007 (69) ALR 562, service of notice upon respondent nos. 1 to 4 and 6 is deemed sufficient. 6. There is delay of 1053 days in filing the present appeal. 7. The present appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and award dated 20.12.2022, passed by Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claims Trib

FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. 233 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam