FARJEENA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CWP-8572-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 118 CWP-8572-2026 Date of Decision: 20.05.2026 Farjeena …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - None for the petitioner Mr. Akshit Pathania, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Shivoy Dhir, Advocate and Mr. Samrit Gill, Advocate for respondent No.2 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent No.2 to de-freeze her bank account maintained with Axis Bank Limited. 2. As per petition, respondent No.2-bank has frozen petitioner’s account without notice. As per petitioner’s information, the bank has acted upon directions of Law Enforcement Agencies. She is not involved in any criminal activity. She is not named in any FIR relating to financial fraud, if any, committed by unknown persons. There is entry of ₹49,500/- which has been credited in her account by unscrupulous ones. There is no order of Magistrate under Section 107 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (‘BNSS’) with respect to her account. The petitioner shall not use sus