Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-05-08

FALAK NAAZ & ORS. vs RAJ KUMAR SARASWAT

Citation / case number
RFA(COMM)-98/2025 2026:DHC:4058-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
FALAK NAAZ & ORS.
Respondent
RAJ KUMAR SARASWAT
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : 08.05.2026 RFA(COMM) 98/2025 CM APPL. 9997/2025 CM APPL. 6536/2026 FALAK NAAZ & ORS. .....APPELLANTS Through: Mr. Pawan Reley, Mr. Kashif Athar., Mr. Akshay Lodhi, Mr. Farak Mirza, Ms Simran Singh and Mr. Tanish Rawat Advs. versus RAJ KUMAR SARASWAT .....RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Rajiv Bakshi, Ms. Kajal Sharma and Mr. Pranav Pareek, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J. (ORAL) RFA(COMM) 98/2025 1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the impugned judgment and final order dated 11.11.2024 passed by the District Judge (Commercial Court), North East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in CS (Comm) No 51 of 2022. The Trial Court has passed a decree for a sum of Rs. 38,73,000/- along with pendent lite and future interest at 9% in favour of the Respondent (i.e., plaintiff). 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants sets up the Appellants’ case as follows: 2.1. Appellant No. 1 is the widow of Late Mr Mohammad Shahid [‘deceased’]