DR VISHAL CHADHA vs STATE OF GOVT OF NCT DELHI THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11389/2024 DR VISHAL CHADHA .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Monika Arora, Mr. Subhrodeep Saha, Ms. Anamika Thakur and Mr. Abhinav Verma, Advocates. versus STATE OF GOVT OF NCT DELHI THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates. Mr. Devvrat Yadav, SPC with Mr. Kartik Sharma, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Kaushal Kumar Sharma, Mr. Aman Karan and Mr. Rohan Jain, Advocates for UPSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER (ORAL) % 11.05.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This writ petition assails judgment dated 9 August 2024 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal1 in OA 583/2023. 2. In view of the developments which have taken place during the 1 “Tribunal” hereinafter Signature Not Verified Signed By:ANUBHAV W.P.(C) 11389/2024 Page 1 of 4 TRIPATHI Signing Date:12.05.2026 17:42:51 currency of these proceedings before this Court, it is not necessary for us to advert in detail to the dispute between the parties. Suffice it to state that the petitioner was aggrieved by the marking given to him by the Union Public Service Commission for his Annual Confidential Reports2. The petitioner’s case was that he was entitled to be given 4 marks for his ACRs which would have entitled him to induction in the post of Medical Officer (Homeopathy) in the GNCTD. 3. This position was conceded by the GNCTD before this Court as is recorded on 17 December 2025. The order passed by this Court on the said date reads as under: “1. Today, it is not denied by the learned counsel for the respondents that the UPSC had wrongly marked the petitioner, and on basis of his ACR, he should have been grant