DINESH KUMAR vs HARYANA STATE AND ORS

145 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-2077-2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.05.2026 Dinesh Kumar ......Appellant Vs. Haryana State and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana, for the respondents. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. On the last date of hearing, Registry was directed to issue notice to the appellant as well as his counsel for the date fixed. 2. As per the office report, notice issued to the appellant has been received back served and learned counsel for the appellant has been informed through e-mail. 3. Despite service, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 4. In view of the above, this Court is now left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 13.05.2026 Virender Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.05.21 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document