Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-20

DHARAMBIR AND ORS. vs RAKESH BRIJ AND ORS.

Citation / case number
FAO 75/2008
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
DHARAMBIR AND ORS.
Respondent
RAKESH BRIJ AND ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

FAO-75-2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 241 FAO-75-2008(O&M) Date of decision: 20.05.2026 Dharambir & Others ...Appellant(s) Vs. Rakesh Brij & Others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Tejinder Pal Singh, Advocate for Mr. Kulbhushan Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Lalit Garg, Advocate for respondent No.6. *** NIDHI GUPTA, J. Present appeal has been filed by the claimants laying challenge to the Award dated 10.04.2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Faridabad (hereinafter ‘the learned Tribunal’) in MVA Petition No.RBT-125 dated 22.04.2005 filed by the appellants/claimants under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter “the Act”), whereby compensation of Rs.50,000/- has been awarded to the appellants on account of ‘No Fault Liability’. The 4 claimants are the parents and 14 and 16-year-old minor brothers of deceased Vinod Kumar who was 24 years old at the time of accident. 2. The pleaded case of the appellants before the learned Tribunal as recorded in Para 1 and 2 of the impugned Award is that: - SUNENA 2026.05.22 16:44 I agree to specified portions of this document FAO-75-2008 “This is a claim