Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-18

DEEPAK vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 20065/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
DEEPAK
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-20065-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 230 CRM-M-20065-2026 Decided on : 18.05.2026 Deepak . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, Addl. AG, Haryana. Ms. Kashish Bansal, Advocate for the complainant(s). **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed here-under:- Name of FIR Date Section(s) Police District Petitioner(s) No. Station Deepak 593 14.10.2025 S. 109(1), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 Industrial Panipat (corresponding S. 307 & 34 of Sector 29 IPC) and S. 25 of Arms Act, 1959 (later on added S.190, 191(3) of BNS, 2023) (corresponding S. 149 & 148 of IPC) 2. Incident in question took place on 13.10.2025 at about 10:00 P.M., complainant – Gurdev was present at home, came to know of suffering of fire-arm injury by his son – Sumit. By taking necessary step