Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-22

DEEPAK vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 28382/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
DEEPAK
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-28382-2026 (O&M) 1 213 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28382-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.05.2026 DEEPAK ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Anshumaan Dalal, Advocate with Ms. Tamanna, Advocate for the petitioner. H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is seeking regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (439 Cr.P.C.) in FIR No.556 dated 23.12.2024 registered under Sections 103(1) (Section 302 IPC), 111(2), 111(3), 111(4), 111(5), 111(6) and 61 of BNS (Section 120-B IPC) and Section 25 of Arms Act, at Police Station Pinjore, District Panchkula, Haryana. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 23.12.2024 at 02.40 AM, in the area of Sultanat Hotel Burjkotia District Panchkula, 2-3 unknown boys came in a car, opened indiscriminate firing and caused the death of Vineet @ Vicky, Tirth and Vandana @ Niya. The incident is stated to be gang-driven. The name of the petitioner surfaced in the supplementary disclosure statement of co-accused Manish @ Kali. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsel