DEEPAK RELHAN vs NEHA RELHAN & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 111/2024, CM APPLs. 50033/2024, 64480/2024, 73551/2024, 40538/2025, 32550/2026 DEEPAK RELHAN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Preeti Singh, Mr. Sunklan Porwal, Ms. Sakshi Trivedi, Ms. Anoushka Bajpai, Advs. along with Petitioner-In Person versus NEHA RELHAN & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Prashant Diwan, Ms. Ishika Jindal, Ms. Ishita Bansal, Advs. for R1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (Oral) REVIEW PET. 220/2026 (For review of orders dated 15.04.2026 and 06.05.2026) CONT.CAS(C) 111/2024 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilful disobedience/ non-compliance with the directions contained in the orders dated 02.12.2022, 08.02.2023, 03.05.2023, 24.05.2023, 01.06.2023, 12.07.2023 and 25.07.2023 passed by the learned Family Court, North- West, Rohini Courts in GP No. 109/2022. 2. Vide the said orders, various directions were issued by the Family Court from time to time, inter alia, as regards the visitation to be afforded to the petitioner qua the minor daughter born out of wedlock between the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CONT.CAS(C) 111/2024 Page 1 of 6 By:UMANG Signing Date:26.05.2026 21:00:35 petitioner and the respondent no.1. 3. During the pendency of the present petition, an order dated 21.03.2025 came to be passed by the Family Court which, after recording the factual background of the matter proceeds to direct as under:- “7. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the custody of minor child needs to be transferred to the father/ petitioner in the best interest and welfare of the child. The mother/ respondent no.1 has consistently moved between different countries making it impossible to provide the child w