DALIP vs THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 117 LPA-1356-2026 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 08.05.2026 Dalip … Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Kuldeep Attri, Advocate for the appellant. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL) 1. The impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge has not been annexed to the present Letters Patent Appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that at the time of filing of the Letters Patent Appeal, the same was not available but now the same is available. Hence, the present Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to challenge the said order by filing afresh Letters Patent Appeal on the same cause of action. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) 08.05.2026 JUDGE sapna adhikari Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No KUMARI SAPNA 2026.05.08 15.31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document