DALER SINGH vs FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE) PUNJAB AND OTHERS

APURVA 2026.05.29 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh appended photocopies of Mutation No. 286, sanctioned in the name of vendees of Pakhar Singh, as well as the Fard Jamabandi of 1997-98. 6. From perusal of the record of AC Ist, it appears that the above plea was not taken by the petitioners before the AC Ist grade at the appropriate stage of partition proceedings and even the Civil Suit for declaration was also instituted on 30.09.2016 i.e. after passing of Naksha Irri on 13.07.2016. However, from the documents appended with the petition, it is abundantly clear that Pakhar Singh had sold the said land measuring 8K-OM comprising Kh. No. 12//16, vide sale deed dated 08.11.1996 to Major Singh and Dharam Singh s/o Surjit Singh and accordingly mutation was also sanctioned in the name of these vendees. But in the jamabandies, instead of Pakhar Singh, name of Amar Singh (predecessor in interest of the petitioners) has been changed/shown as vendor. As a result of the above mistake, total share of the petitioners has been reduced in the khewat comprising of 139K-2M land. This mistake is attributed to the revenue authorities and