Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-19

D.P. REDDY vs UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CWP 23100/2021
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
D.P. REDDY
Respondent
UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-23100-2021 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (253) CWP-23100-2021 Date of Decision : 19.05.2026 D.P. Reddy …Petitioner Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Harparteek Singh Sandhu, Advocate for Mr. Archit Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Additional Standing Counsel Mr. Anmol Puri, Jr. Panel Counsel for the respondent-U.T. Chandigarh. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) 1. The legality of order dated 21.12.2020 (Annexure P-13), passed by the respondents, whereby, the petitioner was directed to vacate the allotted government accommodation, bearing House No.6/16, Sector-7, Chandigarh, was challenged, by filing the instant writ petition, cast under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, as well as, the subsequent orders dated 01.02.2021 (Annexure P-17), 04.05.2021 (Annexure P-17/A) and order dated 19.05.2021 (Annexure P-17/B), whereby, the petitioner was directed to pay the penal rent for occupation of the allotted house, for the period w.e.f. 12.02.2019 to 31.05.2021, along with interest, which is now quantified as DHARAM VIR Rs.23,65,347/-. 2026.05.30 13:07 I