Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-05

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 339 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 339 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 339 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 339 of 2026 Nripendra Pandey .....Revisionist(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Devansh Pandey, Pardeep Narayan Pandey, Ramanand Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Pankaj Kumar Ojha, G.A. Court No. - 85 HON'BLE MANOJ BAJAJ, J. Petitioner has filed this revision petition to challenge the impugned judgment and order dated 15.09.2025 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Exclusive Court (POCSO Act), Basti in Criminal Appeal No.12 of 2025, titled Nripendra Pandey Vs. State of U.P. and another, whereby the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 21.01.2025 passed by Judicial Magistrate-I, Court No.12, Basti in Complaint Case No.1052 of 2015, convicting the petitioner under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, has been upheld. The sentence of six months simple imprisonment alongwith compensation of Rs.7,25,000/- imposed upon the accused-petitioner by the trial court has also been affirmed. The facts of the case are that the complainant namely, Ganga Prasad Shukla brought a criminal complaint bearing no.1052 of 2015 against Nripendra Pand

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 339 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam