Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-14

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 2231 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 2231 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 2231 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2231 of 2026 Juvenile S .....Revisionist(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Raj Mangal Tiwari, Shubham Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Raj Kumar Singh, Vipan Kumar, G.A. Court No. - 80 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. As per office report dated 13.5.2026 notice has been served upon the opposite parties no.3 and 4 but no one turned up to oppose this revision. L earned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State are present. 2. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the order dated 06.02.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, (POCSO Act), District Farrukhabad in Criminal Appeal No.8 of 2025 arising out of Case Crime No.270 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87 BNS and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Kayamganj, District-Farukhabad as well as order dated 20.12.2025 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Fatehgarh, District Farrukhabad, arising out of Case Crime No.270 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87 BNS and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Kayamganj, District-Farukhabad. 3. The following submissions have been

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 2231 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam