Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-06

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1135 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1135 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1135 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1135 of 2026 Farman .....Revisionist(s) Versus State Of U.P. Though It Principal Secretary (Home) And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Atul Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Along with : 1. Criminal Revision No. 853 of 2026: Furkan Versus State of U.P. Though It Principal Secretary (Home) and 3 others Court No. - 85 HON'BLE MANOJ BAJAJ, J. Petitioners have filed these two separate revision petitions to challenge the order dated 06.12.2025 passed by Additional District Judge (POCSO Act), Baghpat passed in Sessions Trial No.22 of 2024, titled State of U.P. Vs. Aasif, arising out of Case Crime No.339 of 2023, under Sections 363 and 376 I.P.C. and 3/4 POCSO Act, registered at Police Station Ramala, district Baghpat, whereby the application filed by the prosecution under Section 319 Cr.P.C. has been allowed and the petitioners have been summoned as an additional accused. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the F.I.R. was registered on 23.12.2023 on the basis of the complaint made by Jabir, who alleged that his two daughters, aged 17 years and 14 years have left the home and

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1135 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam