CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 6958 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6958 of 2026 Neeraj Yadav Alias Neeraj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Divyansh Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 49 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J. 1. Heard Mr. Divyansh Rai, the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned AGA representing State-respondents 1 & 2. 2. Perused the record. 3. At the very outset, the learned counsel for petitioner submits that due to inadvertence, the description of concerned case pending before respondent-2 has not been correctly transcribed in the prayer clause of present writ petition. It is thus, urged by the learned counsel for petitioner that he be permitted to amend the prayer clause of the writ petition as well as the stay application, during course of the day. 4. Prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner is bona fide. 5. Same is not opposed by the learned AGA representing State- respondents 1 & 2. 6. Accordingly, it is allowed. 7. Let necessary amendment in the prayer clause of the writ petition as well as the stay application be carried by the lear