Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-13

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 966 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 966 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 966 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 966 of 2026 Vikas .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neeraj Kumar Chaurasiya, Ravindra Kumar Yadav, Sandeep Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 65 (Sl. No. 103 out of 257) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. As informed by learned State Law Officer, notice to the informant has been served on 13.1.2026. 2. Heard Sri Sandeep Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri R.P. Patel, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 191 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 352, 351(3), 65(1), 87 BNS and 3/4(2) POCSO Act and 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act, Police Station Jhinjhana, District Shamli, during the pendency of trial. ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT: 4. The applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The victim is a consenting party as is but evident from her statement recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S., whereby she has stated that she has married the applicant and is willing to stay with him on

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 966 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam