Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-15

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 948 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 948 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 948 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 948 of 2026 Lorik Nishad And 3 Others .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Chandan Kumar Jaiswal, Satvik Maddheshiya Counsel for Respondent(s) : Pravesh Kumar Tripathi, Vijendra Kumar Mishra, G.A. Court No. - 51 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 2. This Criminal Appeal under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been preferred to quash the charge-sheet dated 19.04.2025 and cognizance order dated 13.05.2025 along with the entire proceedings of Sessions Case No. 1432 of 2025 (State vs. Vishal Nishad & Ors.), arising out of Case Crime No. 104 of 2025, under Section 351(3) of the BNS and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Police Station Ramgarh Tal, District Gorakhpur. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the First Information Report was lodged by the victim against five accused persons, including the present appellants, under Sections 69, 89 and 351(3

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 948 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam