Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-12

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3669 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3669 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3669 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3669 of 2026 Taufiq @ Jumman And 2 Others .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Manju Pandey, Minu Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ankesh Kumar, G.A., Sheetala Prasad Pandey Court No. - 51 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A for the State and perused the entire record. 2. This Criminal Appeal under Section 14-A (1) of The Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been preferred with a prayer to quash charge-sheet no. 1/2025, cognizance/summoning order dated 26th November, 2025 as well as entire proceedings of Sessions Case No. 1658 of 2025 (State Vs. Taufiq @ Jumman & Others), arising out of Case Crime No. 149 of 2025, under Sections- 333, 110, 115 (2), 352 B.N.S. and Sections 3 (1) (da), 3 (1) (dha) and 3 (2) (5A) of SC/ST Act, Police-Station- Kaptanganj, District-Basti, pending in the Court of Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act) Basti. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that from the version as unfolded in the

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3669 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam