Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-08

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3220 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3220 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3220 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3220 of 2026 Rajit Ram Yadav .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Muktesh Kumar Singh, Ramkripal Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 51 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Ram Kripal Yadav, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State, and perused the record. 2. This Criminal Appeal under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been preferred for quashing the charge-sheet dated 05-04-2023, cognizance/summoning order dated 04-05-2024 as well as the entire proceedings of Sessions Case No. 337 of 2024, arising out of Case Crime No. 287 of 2019, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act, Police Station Robertsganj, District Sonbhadra. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to departmental and personal animosity arising out of official proceedings initiated against the i

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3220 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam