Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-07

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2973 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2973 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2973 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2973 of 2026 Vikram And 2 Others .....Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Himanshu Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Pintu Kumar Bhartiya, Pradhumn Kumar Pandey Court No. - 51 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Himanshu Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Pradhumn Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State, and perused the entire record. 2. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been preferred against the order dated 23.02.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Mathura in S.S.T. No. 868 of 2025 (State vs. Vikram and Others), under Sections 452 and 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST Act, whereby the discharge application filed by the appellants under Section 227 Cr.P.C. has been rejected. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the entire prosecution case is false, concocted and has been maliciously instituted on account of previous enmity and land dispute between the pa

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2973 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam