Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

CIVIL PANCHAYAT KAMBALI vs STATE OF PBE.TC.

Citation / case number
RFA 628/2001
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
CIVIL PANCHAYAT KAMBALI
Respondent
STATE OF PBE.TC.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 628 of 2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 Civil Panchayat, Kambali, Tehsil Mohali, Distt. Ropar ...Appellant Versus The Punjab State and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Raj Kumar Rathore, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 to 9, 11 & 13. Mr. Maninder Singh Garcha, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Ms. Mehak Kanwar, Advocate, for the PUDA/GMADA **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel(s) for the respondent(s) as well as GMADA submit(s) that the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment dated 05.11.2009 passed by this Court in a bunch of appeals, lead case of which was RFA No. 2378 of 2000, titled “State of Punjab Versus Gurdial Chand and others”, whereby the appeals preferred at the instance of landowners as well as by the State were dismissed, while maintaining the determination of the market value by the learned Reference Court. [2] No one appears on behalf of the appellant. [3] After going through the judgment passed in Gurdial Chand’s case (sup