CHHOTO DEVI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (120) CRM-M-25578-2022 (O&M) Chhoto Devi ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and another ……Respondent(s) Decided on : 06.05.2026 Date of uploading: 06.05.2026 CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Vikas Lochab, Advocate for the petitioner (s). Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Senior DAG, Haryana. ***** Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral): 1. The substantive prayer made in the instant petition reads thus: “It is, therefore most respectfully prayed that FIR No. 79 Dated: 15.02.2022 6 & 7 of The Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act 1963 Police Station Sadar Sonipat District: Sonipat (Annexure P/1) may kindly be quashed and all others consequential proceedings arising there-from against the petitioners may kindly be set aside. 2. It is the common ground between the learned rival counsel that he petitioner has since passed away on 12.05.2024 & hence, the petition in hand has been rendered infructuous. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. (SUMEET GOEL) May 06, 2026 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.05.