CANARA BANK vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE REWARI AND OTHERS

1 7 1 2026:PHHC:069451-DB CWP-7200-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7200-2025 Date of decision:-05.05.2026 CANARA Bank ...Petitioner Versus District Magistrate, Rewari and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present :- Mr. Nitin Grover, Advocate for the petitioner (THROUGH V.C.). Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3. Ms. Shreya Mangla, Advocate for Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. 2k 2s 2k SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. Ms. Shreya Mangla, Advocate for Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.4 and 5 and has filed vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. At the outset, counsel for the petitioner states that although this petition has been filed to direct respondnts No.1 to 3 to assist in getting physical possession of the mortgaged properties mentioned in 119 2 nove PHC coo CWP-7200-2025 Schedule A & B on page four of the paper-book, but insofar property detailed in Schedule A is concerned, its possession has been taken and it has been sold in auction. He states that insofar as this property is concerned, petition has become