BUSHR PARVEEN vs DR AAMIR KHAN

Judgment text excerpt

$~87 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 21.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 54/2025 BUSHR PARVEEN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh Lal, Ms. Heena Bisht, Mr. Abhishek Ranjan and Mr. Afjal Ansan, advocates alongwith Petitioner in person. versus DR AAMIR KHAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anand Kumar, Mr. Afajal Ansari and Mr. Chetan Singh, Advs. alongwith respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL.2706/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 54/2025 3. The factual background in the context of which the petition has been filed, is peculiar. 4. The petitioner initially filed an FIR No. 438/2021 under Sections 376 and 328 of the IPC at P.S. Ranjit Nagar against the respondent. Following the registration of the said FIR, a Nikahnama was performed between the parties. 5. Vide order dated 18.12.2021 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, the respondent was granted bail. Thereafter, on Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CONT.CAS(C) 54/2025 Page 1 of 6 By:CHINU LUTHRA Signing Date:23.05.2026 16:18:31 06.03.2022, a formal marriage ceremony took place between the parties. 6. Subsequently, the parties executed a compromise deed dated 04.04.2022, which was made the basis for quashing of the aforesaid FIR. The said compromise deed, inter-alia, contemplated that the respondent would bear all household expenses and pay a dedicated monthly allowance of Rs.25,000/- to the petitioner for her personal expenses. 7. Thereafter, in the above background, this Court vide order dated 24.05.2022 passed in CRL.M.C. 175/2022, quashed the aforesaid FIR No. 438/2021. It is the case of the petitioner that almost immediately after quashing of the said F