BITNEXY PRIVATE LTD vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 126 CWP-12610-2026 Date of Decision: 20.05.2026 BITNEXY PRIVATE LTD ...Petitioner Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Pankaj Bains, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate (through V.C) for respondent-Bank *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking directions to de-freeze his Bank Account maintained with respondent-HDFC Bank. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent- Bank has frozen petitioner’s account without notice. As per petitioner’s information, the Bank has acted upon directions of Law Enforcement Agencies. He is not involved in any criminal activity. He is not named in any FIR relating to financial fraud, if any, committed by unknown persons. There is entry of ₹12,257/- which has been credited in his account by unscrupulous ones. There is no order of Magistrate under Section 107 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (‘BNSS’) with respect to his account. The petitioner shall not use suspicious amount. 3. Learned counsel for t