Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

BHOLANATH RAJPATI SHUKLA AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 199/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
BHOLANATH RAJPATI SHUKLA AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 209 CRM-M-199-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.05.2026 BHOLANATH RAJPATI SHUKLA AND OTHERS ...... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Sartaj Singh Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gurinder Singh Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Verma, Asstt. A.G. Haryana. Mr. Lalit Pathak, Advocate for the complainant. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH. J.(Oral) 1. This petition for pre-arrest bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.442 dated 09.09.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 316(2), 344 and 61 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Badhshahpur, District Gurugram. 2. Vide order dated 19.01.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bail/surety VIPIN KUMAR 2026.05.27 20:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-199-2026 2 bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the pet