Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-22

BHIM SINGH YADAV AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHER

Citation / case number
CWP 16788/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
BHIM SINGH YADAV AND ANOTHER
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-16788-2026 143 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16788-2026 Date of Decision :-22.05.2026 Bhim Singh Yadav and another .......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Yashvardhan Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioners have approached this Court assailing show-cause notice dated 12.05.2026, Annexure P5, issued by the District Town Planner, Rewari, whereby petitioners have been asked to explain erection of boundary wall in village Maheshwari, Tehsil Dharuhera, District Rewari, in contraventions of provisions of Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controller Areas Restrictions of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 (for short – ‘1963 Act’). 2. Counsel states that a perusal of the show-cause notice shows that an opportunity of hearing is to be given to the petitioners on 18.05.2026, but this notice was never served, rather it was pasted on the boundary wall. He submits that upon coming to know of the show-cause notice, petitioners submitted a reply, Annexure P6, which is no