BHIM SINGH vs SUDHIR RAJPAL, IAS AND OTHERS

merc mon COCP-393-2026 (O&M) eee 211 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-393-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 26.05.2026 Bhim Singh .... Petitioner Versus Shri Sudhir Rajpal, IAS & ors. ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN wae Present :- Mr. Abhijeet Singh Rawaley, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, D.A.G., Haryana ee PANKAJ JAIN, J. (QRAL) CM-10176-CII-2026 For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowed. Documents are taken on record. COCP-393-2026 1 Learned State counsel submits that fresh order dated 25.05.2026 has been passed. Copy of the order has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner. 2 The same satisfies counsel for the petitioner. 3 The respondents are directed to supply the calculation sheet to the petitioner, pursuant to which the financial benefits have been released, within one week. 5096.05.27°17:50 integrity of this document 2026:PHHC-084237 COCP-393-2026 (O&M) es 4 In view of above, no further order is required to be passed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to assail the order passed in deference of the order passed by the Writ court, if the need arises. 5 Contempt pet