Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-06

BHIM SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

Citation / case number
RSA 1743/2017
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
BHIM SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

RSA-1743-2017 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 RSA-1743-2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 06.05.2026 Bhim Singh ...... Appellant versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. S.P. Chahar, Advocate and Ms. Savita Chahar, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Plaintiff is in second appeal. 2. Plaintiff filed suit for declaration with the consequential relief of permanent injunction. As per plaintiff, he is owner in possession of one house comprised in Khewat No.166 and 167 situated in Abadi Deh of Village and Post Office Khairanti, Tehsil Meham, District Rohtak depicted by boundaries in the plaint. The property was owned by Jas Ram. The property thereafter came under the title of grandfather of the plaintiff. After death of his grandfather, the same travelled to father of the plaintiff and thereafter to him. As per plaintiff, there was a dispute between the present plaintiff and his cousin namely Sultan and Rohtas with respect to open chowk and house. DINESH KUMAR 20