BHAWANA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP-15223-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 132 CWP-15223-2026 Date of Decision: 15.05.2026 Bhawana …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate, Mr. Viransh Ghawari, Advocate, Ms. Hemlata, Advocate and Ms. Atul, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana (assisted by Mr. Arun Sharma, Office of Haryana Parivar Suraksha Nyas, Panchkula) *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of communication dated 16.12.2024 whereby her claim for compensation under Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Antyodaya Parivar Suraksha Yojna (for short ‘Deen Dayal Yojna’) has been rejected. 2. As per petition, the petitioner’s son passed away on 09.05.2024. He was 26 years old. His annual family income as per Parivar Pehchan Patra was less than ₹1,80,000. The petitioner filed an online application on 23.05.2024 seeking compensation under Deen Dayal Yojna. The respondent vide order dated 16.12.2024 has rejected her claim on the ground that there was