Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

BHATERI AND OTHERS vs MANJEET AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
FAO 6844/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
BHATERI AND OTHERS
Respondent
MANJEET AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

-1- 109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-6844-2025 Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 BHATERI AND OTHERS ...Appellants Versus MANJEET AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Balkar Singh, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for respondent No.3/insurance company. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) CM-24310-CII-2025 For the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay of 34 days in filing the appeal, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Main Case Present appeal has been preferred by the appellants/claimants being wife and two sons of deceased- Rajbir (hereinafter referred to as ‘deceased’), who died in motor vehicular accident dated 08.05.2024, caused due to the rash and negligent driving of respondent No.1 while driving car bearing registration No.HR-10AG-3409. 2. Being aggrieved by the impugned award 04.08.2025, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sonipat (hereinafter referred to as CHIRANJEEV SINGH 2026.05.29 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document FAO-6844-2025 -2- ‘Tribunal’), vide which appellants-claimants were found entitled to total compensa