Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-29

BHANPATI vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 29417/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
BHANPATI
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 213 CRM-M-29417-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.05.2026 BHANPATI ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Hukam Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amrik Narwal, DAG, Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.55, dated 14.02.2026, under Sections 115, 118(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(3) BNS, registered at Police Station Naranud, District Hansi. 2. On 21.05.2026, this Court had passed the following order:- “Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 24.02.2026, however, she apprehends her arrest on account of Section 118(2) of BNS, 2023 having been added during the investigation. However, the injury regarding the said offence is attributed to co-accused Golu and simple to the petitioner. She is not involved in any other case and is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. Notice of motion. At the asking of the Cou