BALWINDER SINGH AND ANR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

115 Ean 2026:PHHC:073849 Soe IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5506-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 12.05.2026 BALWINDER SINGH AND ANR «PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. .sRESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. K.S. Sidhu, Advocate and Ms. Kirandeep Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of writ in nature of Mandamus directing the official Respondents No. 2 to 4 to protect the lives and personal liberty of the petitioners and their family members from the hands of the private respondents who are unnecessarily harassing day and night and also filing false, vague, frivolous and motivated complaint against the petitioners and their daughter, namely Harsimran Jeet Kaur, presently residing in Australia. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that for redressal of their grievance, the petitioners have already filed a complaint/representation dated 01.05.2026 (Annexure P-7) before the Addl. Director General of Police (NRI Affairs), Punjab, NRI Wing, Phase-7, SAS Nagar, however no action has been taken on the same till