Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-09

BALRAM vs HIMANSHU AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
FAO 386/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
BALRAM
Respondent
HIMANSHU AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

517 FAO-386-2026 (O&M) BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH FAO-386-2026 (O&M) Date of decision-09.05.2026 BALRAM VS HIMANSHU AND OTHERS Present: Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Vishal Jassal, Advocate for the applicant-appellant. Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate with Ms. Babita Rawat, Deputy Manager National Insurance Co. Ltd. *** CM-1774-CII-2026 Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant and learned counsel for the respondent(s) are ad idem that the parties to the appeal in question are ready to settle the matter in question in all respects but an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal is pending decision. In view of their such stand, delay of 969 days in filing the appeal is condoned. CM is disposed of. Main Case As agreed in terms of statements of learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel and representative of the respondent-Insurance Company (separately recorded), a sum of Rs. 16,50,000/- (Sixteen Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only) over and above the amount awarded by the Tribunal is allowed to the appellant(s) in full and final settlement of the claim in this appeal. As per the statement of learned counsel for the appell