BALRAJ SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 CWP-24720-2022 Date of Decision: 19.05.2026 Balraj Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus State Bank of India and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI ---- Present: Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate; Ms. Seema Sharma, Advocate Mr. Mittardeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Sumit Narang, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Upon instructions, counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 – Bank states that the account has been regularized and, thus, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 3. Liberty is, however, granted to the petitioners to seek revival of the writ petition in case, it transpires that statement made by respondents No.1 and 2 – Bank, turns out to be factually incorrect. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) May 19, 2026 JUDGE Varinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VARINDER PRASHAD 2026.05.22 18:32 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC