Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

BALJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER vs SHO/IO, PS BALONGI, MOHALI AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CRM-M 23409/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
BALJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER
Respondent
SHO/IO, PS BALONGI, MOHALI AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 133 CRM-M-23409-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 27.05.2026 Baljit Singh and another ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHO/IO, P.S. Balongi, SAS Nagar, Mohali & Ors. … Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed for seeking quashing of impugned order dated 08.10.2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, SAS Nagar, Mohali as well as the order dated 13.02.2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kharar whereby the complaint filed by the petitioner bearing CRM-195-2022 dated 01.09.2022 titled as “Baljit Singh and another Vs. Ld. SHO and others” had been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners contends that Raunak Singh son of Narain Singh, who is father of Sukhwant Kaur (wife of petitioner No.1 and mother of petitioner No.2) was owner in possession of the land situated at Village Daun, Tehsil Kharar, District Ropar. Sukhwant’s mother i.e. wife of Raunak Singh had precedeased him and Sukhwant Kaur was the only legal heir of Raunak Singh. Later, one Krewanama da