BALI SINGH ETC. vs PHINO ETC.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (217) RSA-1163-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision:-07.05.2026 BALI SINGH AND OTHERS … Appellants Versus PHINO AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. None is present for the parties. On the previous date, learned counsel for the appellants submitted that they are not in touch with the appellants. So, notice was ordered to be issued to the appellants. Notice has been received back with the report that appellants No.1, 4 and 5 are not residing at the given address and appellants No.2 and 3 are dead. None for the LRs of the appellants No.2 and 3 has come forward to contest the appeal. It seems that parties have lost interest in pursuing the appeal. 2. In such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case on the docket, indefinitely. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. As a natural corollary, since the main case stand dismissed for want of prosecution of, all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, as no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping them pen