BALBIR SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB

CRR-2155-2010 1- 210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-2155-2010 Date of Decision:06.05.2026 Balbir Singh …Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr. Dinesh Maurya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bhanu Partap Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. 1. The petitioner has filed the present revision petition against the impugned judgment dated 07.07.2010, passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Barnala, whereby, the appeal filed by the petitioner was ordered to be dismissed and the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.11.2009, passed by the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barnala, whereby, the petitioner was ordered to be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 408 of IPC and was sentenced as under:- Under Section 408 of IPC R.I for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-. In default of payment of fine, he shall undergo further R.I for one month. . 2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that Rakesh Kumar Bansal got recorded his statement Ex.PA with SI Raj Kumar that he is resident of Patel Nagar, Barnala and is owner of Petrol