BACHNI AND ORS vs JAGIR AND ORS

[110] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-4641-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision : 05.05.2026 Bachni widow of Chhajju and others …Appellants versus Jagir son of Chhajju and others ….Respondents Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Raj Kapoor Malik, Advocate and Mr. Vishesh Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Sanjiv Kumar, Aggarwal, Advocate (through V.C.) and Mr. AVS Parmar, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Siddharth Gulati, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) [1] The plaintiffs are in second appeal. [2] During the course of arguments, it came to the notice of this Court that on dismissal of the suit, the plaintiffs filed appeal before the Lower Appellate Court. During pendency thereof, an application was filed under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC. Though the appeal was decided but the application under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC remained undecided. [3] The aforesaid factual position pointed out by counsel for the appellants is not controverted by counsel representing the respondents. [4] Mr. Aggarwal, counsel for respondent No.3, however, submits that no suc