Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-06

BABLI vs VIKRAM AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
FAO 1292/2021
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
BABLI
Respondent
VIKRAM AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

FAO-1292-2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 254(2) FAO-1292-2021(O&M) Date of decision: 06.05.2026 Babli ...Appellant(s) Vs. Vikram & Others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Ajay Vijarania, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Vijay Sangwan, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Om Pal Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** NIDHI GUPTA, J. CM-9561-CII-2021 This is an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 305 days in filing the appeal. After going through the contents of the application, the same is allowed subject to all just exceptions and delay of 305 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. MAIN CASE Present appeal has been filed by the claimant no.1 seeking enhancement of compensation of Rs.6,10,000/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hisar (hereinafter ‘the learned Tribunal’) vide Award dated 10.10.2019 passed in Claim Petition No.54 dated 12.04.2018 SUNENA 2026.05.08 14:50 I agree to specified portions of this document FAO-1292-2021 filed under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter “the Act”). The two claimants are the 35-year-old mother and 40-year-old fath