Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

AZAD THAPAR vs OM PARKASH AND ORS.

Citation / case number
IOIN 1-FAO-3642/2006
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
AZAD THAPAR
Respondent
OM PARKASH AND ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 205 IOIN-1-FAO-3642-2006 in/and FAO-3642-2006 Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 Azad Thapar ....Appellant Versus Om Parkash and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI ---- Present: None. **** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) IOIN-1-FAO-3642-2006 1. The office has listed this case as, despite repeated reminders, respondent Nos.1 and 2 remain unrepresented. The following order was passed on 18.02.2026:- “Despite learned counsel for the appellant having been informed, as per office report, no steps have been taken to comply with the order dated 28.07.2025, which reads thus: “Office report perused. No one has caused appearance on behalf of appellant, despite being informed through e-mail. Respondents no.1 and 2 has also not been served till date due to non-supply of correct address. Therefore, upon taking corrective measures by the appellants to serve respondents no.1 and 2, within 15 days from today, let fresh notice be issued to him by the Registry of this Court, returnable on 04.09.2025. The appellants are at liberty to serve the aforesaid respondents through the counsel appearing, before the tribunal concerned. VARINDER PR