Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04
AZAD THAPAR vs OM PARKASH AND ORS.
- Citation / case number
- FAO 3642/2006
- Court
- Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Petitioner
- AZAD THAPAR
- Respondent
- OM PARKASH AND ORS.
Judgment text excerpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 205 IOIN-1-FAO-3642-2006 in/and FAO-3642-2006 Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 Azad Thapar ....Appellant Versus Om Parkash and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI ---- Present: None. **** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) IOIN-1-FAO-3642-2006 1. The office has listed this case as, despite repeated reminders, respondent Nos.1 and 2 remain unrepresented. The following order was passed on 18.02.2026:- “Despite learned counsel for the appellant having been informed, as per office report, no steps have been taken to comply with the order dated 28.07.2025, which reads thus: “Office report perused. No one has caused appearance on behalf of appellant, despite being informed through e-mail. Respondents no.1 and 2 has also not been served till date due to non-supply of correct address. Therefore, upon taking corrective measures by the appellants to serve respondents no.1 and 2, within 15 days from today, let fresh notice be issued to him by the Registry of this Court, returnable on 04.09.2025. The appellants are at liberty to serve the aforesaid respondents through the counsel appearing, before the tribunal concerned. VARINDER PR