Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-25

ASHRAF AHMED MAJAL vs M/S ACTION CONSTRUCTION EQUIPEMENT LTD

Citation / case number
CRM-M 60331/2022
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ASHRAF AHMED MAJAL
Respondent
M/S ACTION CONSTRUCTION EQUIPEMENT LTD
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

2026:PHHC:082465 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 253/3 CRM-M-60331-2022 Date of decision : 25.05.2026 ASHRAF AHMED MAJAL ... PETITIONER Versus M/S ACTION CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LTD. .. RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- | Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod Ghai, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kashish Sahni, Advocate and Mr. Sukrit Chadha, Advocate for the respondent. RKEK H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to seek recourse to alternative remedy available to the petitioner under the law. It is also submitted that an appropriate direction may be issued to the effect that the period spent in pursuing the present petition may not come in the way of availing the statutory remedy. 2. Permitted to do so. 3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 4. However, it is made clear that the delay would not come in the way of the petitioner while availing the statutory remedy available under the law as he was pursuing the present petition. (H.S.GREWAL) May 25, 2026 JUDGE Sonia Whether speaking/reasoned —: Yes