Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

ASHOK RAJ SINGH vs PRAVEEN KUMAR AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CR 3760/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ASHOK RAJ SINGH
Respondent
PRAVEEN KUMAR AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

-1- 132 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3760-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 ASHOK RAJ SINGH ...Petitioner Versus PRAVEEN KUMAR AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh Advocate Mr. Namish Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) The present revision petition has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by petitioner/plaintiff being aggrieved by impugned order dated 07.04.2026 (Annexure P-6), passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Palwal, whereby application for appointment of local commissioner for demarcation of suit property preferred by respondents/defendants was allowed. 2. In the present case, petitioner/plaintiff had preferred a suit for permanent injunction claiming that suit property duly described in the plaint was owned and possessed by the petitioner/plaintiff and respondents/ defendants are trying to interfere in the peaceful possession. On the other hand, it was the case of respondents/defendants that suit property where the container has been placed by petitioner/plaintiff belongs to respondents/ defendants and it is