Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-05-13

ASHOK KUMAR vs MS NANDINI PALIWAL AND ORS

Citation / case number
CONT.CAS(C)-383/2025 2026:DHC:4334
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ASHOK KUMAR
Respondent
MS NANDINI PALIWAL AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~2 to 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 13.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 383/2025, CM APPL. 12694/2026 ASHOK KUMAR .....Petitioner versus MS NANDINI PALIWAL AND ORS. .....Respondent 3 + CONT.CAS(C) 385/2025, CM APPL. 12804/2026 SUSHMITA BISWAS .....Petitioner versus MS NANDINI PALIWAL AND ORS. .....Respondent 4 + CONT.CAS(C) 836/2025, CM APPL. 12695/2026 SHASHI SAINI .....Petitioner versus MS.NANDINI PALIWAL AND ORS. .....Respondent Presence: Mr. Sourabh Ahuja and Mr. Keshav Singh, Advs. for petitioner in item nos. 2 to 4. Mr. B. S. Rawat, CI DTTE for respondents in item nos.2 to 4. Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, SC, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs. for DTTE. Mr. Shivendra Singh, Adv. for DSEU in item nos.2 – 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petitions have been filed by the petitioners alleging wilful disobedience/non-compliance with the directions contained in the judgment/ order dated 28.01.2025 passed in W.P.(C) 12189/2021 & connected matters. The said petitions were disposed of, inter alia, in the following terms: Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT CONT.CAS(C) 383/2025 and connected matters Page 1 of 4 KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:18.05.2026 10:32:04 2. It transpires that after the aforesaid judgment/order was passed, an Office Order dated 03.10.2025 came to be issued by the Department of Training and Technical Education, GNCTD, which reads as under: Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT CONT.CAS(C) 383/2025 and connected matters Page 2 of 4 KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:18.05.2026 10:32:04 3. It can be seen that although Selection Grade has been granted to each of the petitioners from the date mentioned in the aforesaid judgment/order, the requisite fi

ASHOK KUMAR vs MS NANDINI PALIWAL AND ORS · Niyam