Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

ASHOK KUMAR vs GURDIAL SAINI SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CR 6096/2023
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ASHOK KUMAR
Respondent
GURDIAL SAINI SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CR No.6096 of 2023 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 211 Civil Revision No.6096 of 2023 (O&M) Date of decision: May 4th, 2026 Ashok Kumar .....Petitioner Versus Gurdial Saini (since deceased) through LRs and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Ms. Nishtha and Ms. Shaveta, Advocates for the petitioner. Ms. Ekta Thakur, Advocate for the respondents. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the impugned order dated 27.09.2023 passed by District Judge, Hoshiarpur, whereby application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the title of the appeal has been allowed. 2. The facts which are apparent from the impugned order dated 27.09.2023 and are not disputed before this Court are that Hitesh, Harshman and Chaman Lal were not made parties in the memo of parties of the appeal which was instituted by Gurdial Saini (deceased) through his LRs (respondent No.1 herein) as the names of the said three persons were not mentioned in the judgment of the trial Court, although the same were recorded in the decree sheet. The said mistake in the g