ASFAK KURESHI AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 130 CWP-15063-2026 Date of Decision: 14.05.2026 Asfak Kureshi and another …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Abhinav Sood, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana (assisted by PSI Alok) *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of notices dated 07.04.2026 and 16.04.2026 issued by respondent No.2. They are further praying that operation of the impugned notices may be kept in abeyance. They are also seeking direction to respondents to protect their life and liberty as well as not to harass and humiliate them. 2. Learned State counsel submits that as per her instructions, the impugned notices are going to be withdrawn because they have been issued under incorrect provision of law. 3. In the wake of statement of learned State counsel, the petition stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 14.05.2026 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2026.05.14 14