ARUN KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 193 INCOMP-1190-2026 Date of decision: 29.05.2026 ARUN KUMAR ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: None. 2 2k 2k 2k ok RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The instant case was filed on 13.02.2026 by Mr. Rishab Garg, Advocate on which the Registry has raised objections on the same day. 2. As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it, to be re-filed within a total period of 40 days. The same was not taken back for re-filing after removing the objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. 3. Accordingly, the case was listed for today but no one has come present. 4, Keeping in view the above said position coupled with the fact that no one has come forward to pursue the matter, no further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the record. (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE 29.05.2026 Mohit Bishnoi i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/